1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CONRAD v. CATAPANO
 

CONRAD v. CATAPANO

No. A-4567-11T2.

JACQUELINE CONRAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUSAN CATAPANO and JIM CATAPANO, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hobbie, Corrigan & Bertucio, attorneys for appellant (Jacqueline DeCarlo, of counsel and on the brief).

Carton Law Firm, LLC, attorneys for respondents (David J. Leone, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Sabatino and Maven.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

PER CURIAM.

After being run into and injured by defendants' dog, plaintiff brought this personal injury action, asserting claims of negligence and absolute liability. The trial court granted defendants summary judgment, finding the record insufficient to establish that they had reason to know that their dog posed a danger to plaintiff as it ran about their yard. Giving plaintiff all favorable inferences from that record, we conclude that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases