1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROSENBLUM v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF CLOSTER
 

ROSENBLUM v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF CLOSTER

No. A-1967-10T1.

JESSE ROSENBLUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF CLOSTER and ROBERT ARMANIACO, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 17, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse Rosenblum, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Michael B. Kates argued the cause for respondent Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Closter (Kates Nussman Rapone Ellis & Farhi, L.L.P., attorneys; Mr. Kates, of counsel; Alysia M. Proko-Smickley, on the brief).

Stuart D. Liebman argued the cause for respondent Robert Armaniaco (Wells, Jaworski & Liebman, L.L.P., attorneys; Mr. Liebman, of counsel; Sylvia Hall and Andrew S. Kohut, on the brief).

Before Judges Carchman, Fisher and Baxter.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Jesse Rosenblum appeals from a Law Division order affirming the grant of a use variance by the Borough of Closter Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board). The variance authorized the applicant, Robert Armaniaco, to utilize a portion of his property as a contractor's yard even though it was in a residential zone. We conclude the Law Division and the Board properly analyzed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases