1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD v. EAST RUTHERFORD PBA LOCAL 275
 

BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD v. EAST RUTHERFORD PBA LOCAL 275

No. A-5310-09T2.

BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EAST RUTHERFORD PBA LOCAL 275, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 18, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lauren Sandy argued the cause for appellant (Loccke, Correia, Schlager, Limsky & Bukosky, attorneys; Ms. Sandy, on the briefs).

David F. Corrigan argued the cause for respondent (The Corrigan Law Firm, attorneys; Mr. Corrigan of counsel; Mr. Corrigan and Bradley D. Tishman, on the brief).

Before Judges Wefing, Payne and Hayden.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, East Rutherford PBA Local 275 (PBA), appeals from the order of a Law Division judge vacating an arbitrator's decision requiring, until the expiration of the existing collective bargaining agreement, that plaintiff, Borough of East Rutherford (Borough), reimburse PBA members five dollars of the ten-dollar co-pay for physician visits mandated by the State Health Benefits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases