1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 16 A.3d
  5. 16 A.3d 365 (2011)
 

STATE v. R.T.

A-73 September Term 2009

16 A.3d 365 (2011)

205 N.J. 493

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.T., Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 28, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie-Ann M. Justus, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Paula T. Dow, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Michael J. Confusione, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The members of the Court being equally divided on whether the instruction on voluntary intoxication required a new trial (three members finding the error harmful, one finding it harmless, and two finding no error), the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

For affirmance—Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, and ALBIN—3.

For concurrence in part/dissent in part—Chief Justice RABNER—1.

For...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases