1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. XPEKT CORPORATION v. FAME OF NEW YORK, INC.
 

XPEKT CORPORATION v. FAME OF NEW YORK, INC.

No. A-0857-10T4.

XPEKT CORPORATION a/k/a DODEKA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FAME OF NEW YORK, INC., JUNG HYE LEE and SUNG KWON LEE, HIT WEAR, INC., JEONG H. KIM, HYE OK LEE, CLOSET FASHION, INC., SEONG OK SPRING, SEONG PIL LEE, BRYUN SUN LEE, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 19, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse C. Klaproth argued the cause for appellants (Kirsch, Gartenberg, Howard, L.L.P., attorneys; Mr. Klaproth, on the brief).

Robert H. Yu argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges Sapp-Peterson and Simonelli.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Fame of New York, Inc., Jung Hye Lee and Sung Kwon Lee (collectively defendants) appeal from the denial of their motion for sanctions against plaintiff's attorney pursuant to Rule 1:4-8. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The facts are straightforward. On June 4, 2009, plaintiff XPEKT Corporation filed a complaint against defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases