1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ABULKHAIR v. PRUDENTIAL
 

ABULKHAIR v. PRUDENTIAL

No. A-1348-10T2.

ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL, INGRID RIGGIO, and MICHAEL KEMEZIS, ESQ., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 25, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Assem A. Abulkhair , appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Richard M. Tango argued the cause for respondents (McDermott & McGee, attorneys; Mr. Tango, of counsel; Michael W. Cartelli , on the brief).

Before Judges Espinosa and Skillman.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an October 1, 2010 order granting summary judgment dismissing his complaint. We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Wertheimer's October 1, 2010 written decision. Plaintiff's arguments do not warrant any additional discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases