COUNTY OF HUDSON v. DORIC APARTMENT CORPORATION

No. A-3484-09T1.

COUNTY OF HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DORIC APARTMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 17, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven L. Menaker argued the cause for appellant (Chasan Leyner & Lamparello, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Menaker, of counsel; Mr. Menaker and Kirstin Bohn, on the brief).

Michael Farhi argued the cause for respondent (Kates Nussman Rapone Ellis & Farhi, attorneys; Mr. Farhi, on the brief).

Before Judges Payne and Baxter.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

When the Doric Apartments were built on Manhattan Avenue in Union City in the 1960s, Hudson County permitted the developer to expand the structure's parking lot by digging back into the Palisades and then installing a retaining wall on County property that supported the County's roadway and sidewalk. The wall gave way in a storm on April 17, 2007, as did a County-owned wall further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases