1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WONDERLIN v. WONDERLIN
 

WONDERLIN v. WONDERLIN

No. A-6310-08T1.

BETSY A. WONDERLIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT L. WONDERLIN, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 3, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph F. Polino argued the cause for appellant (Polino and Pinto, attorneys; Joseph M. Pinto , on the brief).

Nicole J. Huckerby argued the cause for respondent (Pellettieri, Rabstein & Altman, attorneys; Anne P. McHugh , on the brief).

Before Judges Fisher, Sapp-Peterson and Simonelli.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, defendant Robert Wonderlin argues that the trial judge erroneously denied his motion for modification of various obligations imposed by the judgment of divorce, based on his claim, among others, that plaintiff Betsy A. Wonderlin was cohabiting with another man and that the parties' incomes had changed to a substantial degree. We agree that Robert presented sufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases