BASF CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued April 21, 2010.
Decided December 28, 2010.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Steven P. Benenson, argued the cause for appellant (Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C., attorneys; Mr. Benenson and John T. Chester, of counsel and on the briefs; Mark D. Debrowski, Borden R. Gillis, and Eric L. Probst, on the briefs).
Christopher Landau (Kirkland & Ellis LLP) of the Washington D.C. bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & Barry, LLP, attorneys; William B. McGuire, William H. Trousdale, Mr. Landau, Eugene F. Assaf, (Kirkland & Ellis LLP) of the Washington D.C. bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Daniel T. Donovan (Kirkland & Ellis LLP) of the Washington D.C. bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges Payne, Miniman, and Waugh.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
PER CURIAM.
This appeal involves the interpretation and enforcement of certain pricing provisions contained in a long-term contract for the processing of propylene into propylene oxide,1 a process known as "tolling." Plaintiff BASF Corporation (BASF) brought suit against defendant Lyondell Chemical Corporation (Lyondell),2 contending...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.