1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ALMEIDA v. MARINO
 

ALMEIDA v. MARINO

No. A-2749-09T3.

RHEA ALMEIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JULIE M. MARINO, ESQ. and MARINO & MAURICE, P.C., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 23, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis David Balk argued the cause for appellant (Balk & Cistrelli, P.A., attorneys; Mary M. Theroux , on the briefs).

Michael J. Marone argued the cause for respondent Julie M. Marino (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Marone and William F. O'Connor, Jr. , of counsel and on the brief).

Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP, attorneys for respondent Marino and Maurice, P.C. ( Kristopher M. Dennis joins in the brief and relies on the arguments of respondent Julie M. Marino).

Before Judges Baxter, Koblitz and Newman.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff Rhea Almeida appeals from a January 15, 2010 Law Division order granting the summary judgment motion of defendants, Julie M. Marino and Marino & Maurice, P.C., the firm in which she was a partner.1 We agree with the trial judge's conclusion that even if, as plaintiff claims, plaintiff accepted and executed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases