1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 4 A.3d
  5. 4 A.3d 601 (2010)
 

W.J.A. v. D.A.

Docket No. A-0762-09T3

4 A.3d 601 (2010)

416 N.J. Super. 380

W.J.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.A., Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 27, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley L. Bergman, Jr. , Atlantic City, argued the cause for appellant.

Timothy J. Hinlicky argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges AXELRAD, FISHER and SAPP-PETERSON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SAPP-PETERSON, J.A.D.

In this appeal from the grant of summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's defamation action, we determine whether Internet postings that accuse one of engaging in sexual misconduct are the type of defamatory statements for which damages may be presumed and therefore do not require the aggrieved party to prove actual harm to reputation. The motion judge concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases