SAADALA v. E. BRUNSWICK ZONING BD.

No. A-4999-08T1

991 A.2d 866 (2010)

412 N.J. Super. 541

Mena SAADALA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EAST BRUNSWICK ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and 7-Eleven, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 22, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward F. Liston, Jr., Toms River, argued the cause for appellant.

James A. Tarella, North Brunswick, argued the cause for respondent East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment (Tarella & Liftman, attorneys; Mr. Tarella, of counsel and on the brief).

Peter H. Klouser, Millstone Township, argued the cause for respondent 7-Eleven, Inc. (Heilbrunn, Pape & Goldstein, attorneys; Kenneth L. Pape, of counsel; Jeffrey Zajac, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, FUENTES and GILROY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to determine whether an application for a use variance for establishment of a combined convenience store and retail gasoline station, to replace two separate nonconforming uses for a convenience store and gasoline station, constitutes an expansion of a nonconforming use, which is subject to the more liberal standards for a use variance set forth in Burbridge v. Township of Mine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases