1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 982 A.2d
  5. 982 A.2d 420 (2009)
 

LITTON INDUSTRIES v. IMO INDUSTRIES

A-10/11 September Term 2008

982 A.2d 420 (2009)

200 N.J. 372

LITTON INDUSTRIES, INC. and Litton Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents and Cross-Appellants, v. IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., Varo, Inc., Baird Corporation and Optic-Electronic International, Inc., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 2, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George C. Lamb, III, a member of the Texas bar, Dallas, TX, argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents (Duane Morris, attorneys; Frank A. Luchak, on the briefs, Princeton).

James T. Smith, argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants (Blank Rome, attorneys, Princeton; Mr. Smith, Stephen M. Orlofsky, Princeton and Anthony Merlino, on the briefs).

PER CURIAM.

The principal issue in this appeal is the award and computation of attorneys' fees arising out of a breach of contract action. Plaintiffs sought $9 million in damages for the alleged breach of two provisions in the contract and for fraud. The jury found that defendants breached one provision of the contract, rejected plaintiffs' other claims, and awarded plaintiffs $2.3 million in damages. The trial court determined that the contract provided for attorneys...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases