1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 981 A.2d
  5. 981 A.2d 1267 (2009)
 

BEST v. C&M DOOR CONTROLS, INC.

A-57 September Term 2008.

981 A.2d 1267 (2009)

200 N.J. 348

Thomas BEST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C&M DOOR CONTROLS, INC., Defendant-Respondent, and Christopher O'Keefe and Michael Craven, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 14, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Greenstein, Rahway, argued the cause for appellant (Tobin, Reitman, Greenstein, Caruso, Wiener & Konray, attorneys).

John F. Casey, West Orange, argued the cause for respondent (Wolff & Samson, attorneys; Mr. Casey and Kiran V. Somashekara, on the briefs).

Lewis H. Robertson, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (Mr. Robertson, Jeanne Locicero, and Edward L. Barocas, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

In 2004, Thomas Best sued his former employer, C&M Door Controls, for violations of the Prevailing Wage Act (PWA), N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.25 to -56.47, and the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -14, claiming that he had been underpaid on PWA work and that, when he complained, his employer retaliated against him. Invoking Rule 4:58-3, the offer-of-judgment rule, Best offered to take judgment in the amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases