Per Curiam.
[¶1] Marko Ruot appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of child abuse. On appeal, Ruot argues the district court abused its discretion by allowing testimony regarding the removal of the victim's pants.
[¶2] We conclude Ruot failed to properly preserve his challenge to the testimony of the victim...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.