PER CURIAM.
[¶1] E.L. appeals from a district court order for involuntary treatment with medication. E.L. argues the district court's order is clearly erroneous because clear and convincing evidence does not support the findings that the medication is clinically appropriate, that the medication is the least restrictive means of treating the patient and that the known benefits outweigh the risks. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶...
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.