1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 892 S.E.2d
  5. 892 S.E.2d 89 (2023)
 

ARTER v. ORANGE COUNTY

No. COA23-86.

892 S.E.2d 89 (2023)

Alison ARTER, Petitioner, v. ORANGE COUNTY, Stephen M. Burt, Sharon C. Burt, Jodi Bakst, and Real Estate Experts, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 15, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Petesch Law, by Andrew J. Petesch , Raleigh, for petitioner-appellant.

James C. Bryan , Greensboro, and Joseph Herrin , for respondent-appellee Orange County.

The Brough Law Firm, PLLC, by Robert E. Hornik, Jr. , Chapel Hill, for respondents-appellees Stephen M. Burt, Sharon C. Burt, Jodi Bakst, and Real Estate Experts.

Petitioner, Alison Arter, appeals from the superior court's Order affirming the decision of the Orange County Board of Adjustment ("BOA"). The trial court's order upheld a written determination that land use buffer regulations found in Section 6.8.6 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance ("UDO") did not apply to a gravel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases