MEEKER v. IDS PROPERTY CAS. INS. CO.

No. A13-1302.

846 N.W.2d 468 (2014)

Robert MEEKER, et al., Appellants, v. IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 21, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Curtis Roeder , Roeder Smith Jadin, PLLC, Bloomington, MN, for appellants.

Randall E. Gottschalk , Gottschalk Law, PLLC, Maple Grover, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge; HUDSON, Judge; and STAUBER, Judge.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

Appellants challenge the summary judgment dismissing their property-damage claim against respondent insurer, arguing that the district court erred by determining that respondent was not effectively served by substitute service under Minn. Stat. § 45.028, subd. 2, before the limitations period in their policy expired. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellants Robert and Jacqueline Meeker filed a claim with respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases