CLARK v. CONNOR

No. A13-1110.

843 N.W.2d 785 (2014)

Faron L. CLARK, Respondent, v. Sheri CONNOR, et al., Defendants, Vydell Jones, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 21, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan T. Cariveau , Hazelton Law Firm, PLLC, Bemidji, Minnesota (for respondent).

Paul R. Aamodt , Fargo, North Dakota (for appellant).

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, Presiding Judge; HOOTEN, Judge; and KIRK, Judge.


OPINION

HOOTEN, Judge.

Appellant co-tortfeasor challenges the district court's judgment against her after a jury found the dog-owner tortfeasors liable, arguing that the dog-attack statute precludes apportioning of liability based on comparative fault between tortfeasors. Because we conclude that the legislature did not intend the dog-attack statute to preclude apportioning of liability based on comparative fault between tortfeasors, we affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases