1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. NAVICKAS v. QUILLING
 

NAVICKAS v. QUILLING

No. A11-2148.

Gennine Ann Navickas, Appellant, v. Karl N. Quilling, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed July 2, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kurt J. Niederluecke , Laura L. Myers , Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, (for appellant).

Mark A. Olson , Olson Law Office, Burnsville, Minnesota, (for respondents).

Considered and decided by Kalitowski, Presiding Judge; Schellhas, Judge; and Chutich, Judge.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

CHUTICH, Judge.

Gennine Ann Navickas challenges several orders of the district court, arguing that it erred in denying her summary judgment motion, determining the amount that respondent Karl Quilling was unjustly enriched, denying her request for preaward interest, and granting Quilling costs and disbursements. We affirm the district court's finding that Quilling was unjustly enriched in the amount of $10,000, but reverse and remand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases