1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 792 N.W.2d
  5. 792 N.W.2d 105 (2010)
 

STATE v. EDSTROM

No. A10-912.

792 N.W.2d 105 (2010)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Lori Ann EDSTROM, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 21, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lori Swanson , Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Samuel J. Edmunds , Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney, Eagan, MN, for appellant.

Steven J. Meshbesher , Adam T. Johnson , Meshbesher & Associates, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by LARKIN, Presiding Judge; PETERSON, Judge; and HUDSON, Judge.

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

The state appeals the district court's pretrial rulings granting respondent's request for a Frye-Mack hearing regarding urine testing, denying the state's motion to exclude expert testimony, and excluding from evidence respondent's urine test result. Because we conclude that the district court did not err in holding a Frye-Mack hearing or abuse its discretion in denying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases