TAXPAYERS FOR MICHIGAN CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, Steve Duchane, Randall Blum, and Sara Kandel, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
State of Michigan, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, and Office of Auditor General, Defendants-Appellees.
Taxpayers for Michigan Constitutional Government, Steve Duchane, Randall Blum, and Sara Kandel, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
State of Michigan, Department of Technology, Management and Budget, and Office of Auditor General, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 4, 2021.
Decided July 28, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice (by John C. Philo, Detroit), John E. Mogk, and Tracy A. Peters PLLC (by Tracy A. Peters) for plaintiffs.
Dana Nessel, Attorney General, Fadwa A. Hammoud, Solicitor General, and Matthew B. Hodges, David W. Thompson, and Michael S. Hill, Assistant Attorneys General, for defendants.
Rosati Schultz Joppich & Amtsbuechler PC, Farmington Hills (by Thomas R. Schultz, Carol A. Rosati, Elizabeth Saarela, and Steven P. Joppich) for the Michigan Municipal League, the Government Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, the Michigan Townships Association, and the Michigan Association of Counties, amici curiae.
Andrew A. Paterson for the Taxpayers United Michigan Foundation, amicus curiae.
Dykema Gossett PLLC (by Leonard C. Wolfe, Lansing, Courtney F. Kissel, Bloomfield Hills, and Kyle M. Asher, Lansing) for the Michigan Association of Public School Academies and the Michigan Council of Charter School Authorizers, amici curiae.
Dykema Gossett PLLC (by Steven C. Liedel and Lauren E. Fitzsimons, Lansing), Hassan Beydoun, and William R. Stone, Troy, for the Michigan House of Representatives and the Michigan Senate, amici curiae.
BEFORE THE ENTIRE BENCH.
OPINION
Cavanagh, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
At issue in this case is a dispute over what monies should be included in calculating "total state spending paid to all units of Local Government" under § 30 of the Headlee Amendment, Const. 1963, art. 9, § 30. Plaintiffs argue that the state is shortchanging units of local government...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
