KIZER v. JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION

SC: 160750.

940 N.W.2d 115 (2020)

Thomas KIZER, Jr. and Daniel A. Burress, Plaintiffs, v. JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 27, 2020.


Order

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and it is DISMISSED for the reason that there is no "proceeding" before the Judicial Tenure Commission within the meaning of MCR 9.211(C). The motion to unseal file is DENIED.

Markman, J., did not participate because of discussions he had as Chief Justice with the State Court Administrative Office concerning aspects of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases