Order
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's December 1, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
YOUNG, C.J., and MARKMAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would reverse the Court of Appeals for the reasons set forth in Justice MARKMAN'S dissenting statement in this case, 488 Mich. 979,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.