1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 268 A.3d
  5. 268 A.3d 988 (2022)
 

PLAYMARK, INC. v. PERRET

No. 0091, Sept. Term, 2020.

268 A.3d 988 (2022)

253 Md. App. 593

PLAYMARK INC., et al., v. James P. PERRET.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

January 28, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by: John H. Harman (Coggins, Harman & Hewitt, Rockville, MD) Michael L. Rowan (Ethridge, Quinn, Kemp, Rowan, & Hartinger, Rockville, MD), all on the briefs, for Appellant.

Argued by: Christopher R. Wampler (Wampler & Souder, LLC, Silver Spring, MD), all on the brief, for Appellee.

Panel: Berger, Friedman, Gould, JJ.

James Perret entered into a contract to perform services for (AAA) Sport Systems, Inc. ("AAA"). AAA no longer exists, and its corporate successors, Playmark, Inc. ("Playmark") and Pro Recreation, LLC ("Pro Rec"), now seek to avoid paying him. We hold that Playmark and Pro Rec each bear successor liability for the contractual obligations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases