1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 256 A.3d
  5. 256 A.3d 829 (2021)
 

KIDDER v. STATE

No. 53, Sept. Term, 2020.

256 A.3d 829 (2021)

475 Md. 113

Jonathan Torin KIDDER, v. STATE of Maryland.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

August 4, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Anne J. Martin, Assigned Public Defender (Alston & Bird LLP, Washington, DC; Anne K. Olesen, Assigned Public Defender, The George Washington University Jacob Bums Community Legal Clinics, Washington, DC), on brief, for Petitioner.

Argued by Andrew J. DiMiceli, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian E. Frosh, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Respondent.

Argued before: Barbera, C.J.; McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, Booth and Biran, JJ.

One who is charged with a serious crime has a constitutional right to trial by an impartial jury. That right has long been understood to implicitly require that a jury be selected from a fair cross-section of the community. The fair cross-section requirement does not mean that a jury must precisely mirror the demographics of the community...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases