1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 255 A.3d
  5. 255 A.3d 89 (2021)
 

IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS v. TIMM

No. 18, Sept. Term, 2020.

255 A.3d 89 (2021)

474 Md. 495

IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC. v. Curtis J. TIMM, et al.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 15, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by G. Stewart Webb, Jr. (Mitchell Y. Mirviss, Venable LLP of Baltimore, MD; Pamela S. Palmer, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP of Los Angeles, CA) on brief, for Petitioner.

Argued by Daniel S. Katz (John B. Isbister and Timothy R. VanCisin, Tydings & Rosenberg LLP of Baltimore, MD; Curtis J. Timm pro se of Sarasota, FL) on briefs, for Respondents.

Argued before: Barbera, C.J., McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, Booth and Biran, JJ.

As every lawyer knows, ambiguity happens. Ambiguity can happen in a contract provision for any number of reasons — the parties did not anticipate all of the circumstances to which the provision might apply; the parties believed that clarifying the provision would be an obstacle to an agreement on seemingly more important terms...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases