1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 230 A.3d
  5. 230 A.3d 965 (2020)
 

STATE v. DAY

No. 67, Sept. Term, 2019.

230 A.3d 965 (2020)

469 Md. 526

STATE of Maryland, v. James Kareen DAY.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 10, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Karinna M. Rossi, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian E. Frosh, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD) on brief, for Petitioner.

Argued by Brian M. Saccenti, Asst. Public Defender (Paul B. DeWolfe, Public Defender of Maryland, Baltimore, MD) on brief, for Respondent.

Barbera, C.J., McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, Booth, Biran, JJ.

After imposition of a sentence in a criminal case, a defendant may seek modification of that sentence pursuant to Maryland Rule 4-345(e). To obtain such review, Maryland Rule 4-345(e)(1) provides that the defendant must file a motion seeking modification within ninety days after imposition of the sentence. Recently, in State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases