1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 223 A.3d
  5. 223 A.3d 1050 (2020)
 

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR v. DEPT. OF FINANCE

No. 2910, Sept. Term, 2018.

223 A.3d 1050 (2020)

244 Md. App. 304

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC. v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF BALTIMORE CITY.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

January 29, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by: Virginia A. Seitz (Gordon D. Todd, Jacquelyn E. Fradette, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C. and Benjamin Rosenberg, Jamar R. Brown, Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP, Baltimore, MD), all on the brief, for Appellant.

Argued by: Rachel Simmonsen (Michael Redmond, Andre M. Davis, City Solicitor, Matthew W. Nayden, Chief, Litigation Division, Steven J. Potter, Chief Solicitor, Baltimore City Department of Law, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Panel: Berger, Beachley, Wells, JJ.

This appeal involves a constitutional challenge to Baltimore City Ordinance 13-139 ("the Ordinance"), which imposes an excise tax ("the Tax") on outdoor advertising displays. Balt. City Code Art. 28, § 29. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. ("Clear Channel") owns or operates hundreds of billboards subject to the Tax. It initially challenged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases