1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 211 A.3d
  5. 211 A.3d 307 (2019)
 

DACKMAN v. ROBINSON

No. 60, Sept. Term, 2018.

211 A.3d 307 (2019)

464 Md. 189

Elliot DACKMAN, et al. v. Daquantay ROBINSON, et al.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 24, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Frank F. Daily (Sean P. Edwards and Lisa M. Morgan, The Law Offices of Frank F. Daily, P.A., Hunt Valley, MD), on brief, for Petitioners.

Argued by Bruce H. Powell (Law Offices of Peter T. Nicholl, Baltimore, MD) and Argued by John Amato, IV (Goodman, Meagher & Enoch, LLP, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Respondents.

Argued before: Barbera, C.J., Greene McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, Sally D. Adkins (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.

In this lead-based paint case, we are once again asked to address issues that are related to the admissibility of expert testimony. Unlike many of the lead-based paint cases that have come before this Court, this case does not involve an issue as to the reasonable probable source of lead exposure or medical causation. Instead, we decide...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases