1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 164 A.3d
  5. 164 A.3d 254 (2017)
 

ROCHKIND v. STEVENSON

No. 76, Sept. Term, 2016

164 A.3d 254 (2017)

164 Md. 245

Stanley ROCHKIND v. Starlena STEVENSON.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 11, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Thomas J. Cullen, Jr. (Constantine J. Themelis, Goodell, DeVries Leech & Dann, LLP of Baltimore, MD; M. Natalie McSherry, Christopher C. Jeffries, Kramon & Graham, P.A. of Baltimore; Ronald D. Getchey, Charles A. Danaher, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP of San Diego, CA) on brief, for Petitioner.

Argued by Scott E. Nevin (The Law Offices of Peter T. Nicholl of Baltimore, MD) and Suzanne C. Shapiro (Suzanne C. Shapiro Law, LLC of Baltimore, MD) on brief, for Respondent.

Argued before Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten and Getty, JJ.

We have often said that when it comes to expert testimony, trial court judges protect juries from "junk science" and other unsupported scientific conclusions. But in the complex field of behavioral disorders, the task of determining whether causation testimony rests on sound science is fraught with potential pitfalls. This...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases