1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 100 A.3d
  5. 100 A.3d 1159 (2014)
 

ACKER v. STATE

No. 513, September Term, 2011.

100 A.3d 1159 (2014)

219 Md. App. 210

Robert Mitchell ACKER v. STATE of Maryland.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

September 30, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ben Miller (Paul B. DeWolfe, Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for appellant.

Ryan Dietrich (Douglas Gansler, Atty. Gen., on the brief) Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Panel: DEBORAH S. EYLER, WOODWARD, and KEHOE, JJ.

ON REMAND

KEHOE, J.

Maryland Rule 5-802.1(b) permits the introduction of a witness's prior consistent statement as substantive evidence "if the statement is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of fabrication, or improper influence or motive...." The Court of Appeals has interpreted this rule to include a temporal restriction, namely, that a prior consistent statement is admissible under Rule 5-802.1(b) only if "it was made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases