The petitioner, Imre Kifor, appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. We affirm.
In his petition, Kifor stated that he was seeking relief from "activities" of the respondents that "are continually not according to the course of the common law." His claims appear to stem from several different proceedings, both in the trial court and the Appeals Court, and he argued, among other things, that he...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.