1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ANDERSON v. PETE
 

ANDERSON v. PETE

No. 2010-CA-000472-MR.

MICHAEL ANDERSON, JR.; AND MALIK ANDERSON, THROUGH HIS MOTHER AND LEGAL GUARDIAN, ELIZABETH ANDERSON, Appellants, v. MICKIEL PETE; COCHRAN, CHERRY, GIVENS, SMITH, SISTRUNK & SAMS, P.C., F/K/A COCHRAN, CHERRY, GIVENS, SMITH & SISTRUNK, P.C.; AND DENNIS C. BURKE, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Rendered: October 7, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Mour, Zachary L. Taylor, Louisville, Kentucky, Briefs for Appellants.

Scott A. Davidson, Louisville, Kentucky.

James D. Ballinger, Louisville, Kentucky, Brief for Appellees.

BEFORE: TAYLOR, CHIEF JUDGE; MOORE AND WINE, JUDGES.

OPINION

WINE, Judge.

Michael Anderson, Jr. and Malik Anderson, a minor, by and through his guardian and mother, Elizabeth Anderson, appeal from a summary judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court dismissing their professional negligence claims against the Honorable Mickiel Pete and the law firm of Cochran, Cherry, Givens, Smith, Sistrunk & Sams, P.C. (hereinafter, "Pete") with prejudice. Upon a review of the record, we reverse the summary judgment.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases