1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 966 N.E.2d
  5. 966 N.E.2d 91 (2012)
 

CURRY v. D.A.L.L. ANOINTED, INC.

No. 45A04-1106-CT-290.

966 N.E.2d 91 (2012)

Gladys E. CURRY and Thomas Curry, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. D.A.L.L. ANOINTED, INC., Appellee-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

March 8, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Banasiak , Highland, IN, Attorney for Appellants.

Joseph Stalmack , Joseph Stalmack & Associates, P.C., Munster, IN, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Gladys E. Curry ("Gladys") and her husband, Thomas Curry ("Thomas")(collectively "the Currys"), appeal from the trial court's order dismissing their complaint for injuries and loss of consortium against D.A.L.L. Anointed, Inc. ("D.A.L.L."). The Currys present several issues for our review, the following of which is dispositive: Whether the trial court erred by dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases