1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 948 N.E.2d
  5. 948 N.E.2d 1154 (2011)
 

IN RE McKINNEY

No. 18S00-0905-DI-220.

948 N.E.2d 1154 (2011)

In the Matter of Mark R. McKINNEY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

June 16, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin P. McGoff , Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for the Respondent.

G. Michael Witte , Executive Secretary, Charles M. Kidd , Staff Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.

Attorney Discipline Action.

Hearing Officer Steven H. David.1

PER CURIAM.

We find that Respondent, Mark R. McKinney, while serving as a deputy prosecuting attorney, conducted asset forfeiture proceedings in a manner that created a conflict of interest between his duties as a public official and the private gain he realized in the forfeiture proceedings. On numerous occasions when the ethics of the asset forfeiture procedures were called into question, Respondent turned a blind eye and acted to protect his private interest in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases