1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 948 N.E.2d
  5. 948 N.E.2d 668 (2011)
 

PEKIN INS. v. RECURRENT TRAINING CENTER

No. 1-10-1085.

948 N.E.2d 668 (2011)

PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RECURRENT TRAINING CENTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant (Jennifer Garland, Rande Repke, Morgan Stanley and Company, Inc., HK Golden Eagle, Inc., Defendants).

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division.

April 20, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard R. Harden, Mark H. Chu, Thomas, Mamer & Haughey, LLP, Champaign, for Defendant-Appellant.

Robert Marc Chambers, Sara Jane Brundage, Pretzel & Stouffer, Chtd., Chicago, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

OPINION

Justice MURPHY delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

Plaintiff, Pekin Insurance Company, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment seeking a determination of whether it owed defendant Recurrent Training Center a duty to defend it in underlying litigation. The trial court found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend Recurrent Training Center in the underlying actions. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases