1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 940 N.E.2d
  5. 940 N.E.2d 78 (2010)
 

MAXUM INDEM. CO. v. GILLETTE

No. 3-10-0006.

940 N.E.2d 78 (2010)

MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Don and Betty GILLETTE d/b/a Gillette Parade Products, Cecilia Kaler and Howard Kaler, Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

November 22, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Cunningham, Kathy Karaboyas Malamis, Tressler, LLP, Chicago, for Maxum Indemnity Company.

Darrell K. Seigler, Attorney at Law, Ottawa, for Don Gillette.

Thomas L. McClintock, Aplington, Kaufman, McClintock, Steele & Barry, LaSalle, for Cecilia Kaler.

Justice McDADE delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action filed in the circuit court of LaSalle County to resolve insurance coverage issues. Plaintiff, Maxum Indemnity Company, appeals arguing that the court erred in determining that it owed a duty to defend defendant, Don & Betty Gillette, d/b/a Gillette Parade Products. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Defendant is engaged in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases