1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 219 P.3d
  5. 219 P.3d 1188 (2009)
 

CRUMP v. BROMLEY

No. 35666.

219 P.3d 1188 (2009)

Doug CRUMP and Amy Crump, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ted BROMLEY dba Rhino Lining, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, St. Anthony, September 2009.

October 26, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Driscoll & Associates, PLLC, Idaho Falls, for appellants. B.J. Driscoll argued.

Blaser, Sorensen & Oleson, Chtd., Blackfoot, for respondent. Justin B. Oleson argued.

BURDICK, Justice.

Appellants Doug and Amy Crump (the Crumps) appeal from the district court's decision affirming the magistrate court's award of attorney fees and costs to Ted Bromley (Bromley), d/b/a Rhino Lining, as the prevailing party. The Crumps argue that both courts erred in determining prevailing party status. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Crumps retained the services of Bromley...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases