FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
v.
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. and Novant Health, Inc., Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Signed June 5, 2024.
Signed June 5, 2024.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Nathan Brenner, Anusha Sunkara, Christopher Douglas Harris, Cory Gordon, Edward Takashima, Goldie Veronica Walker, Habin Chung, Jeanne Liu Nichols, Jennifer Fleury, Justin Lorber, Karen Horvitz Hunt, Kennan Khatib, Kurt Walters, Matthew E. Joseph, Nicolas Stebinger, Noel Miller, Ryan Maddock, Susan Musser, Ethan Dean Stevenson, Louis Naiman, Federal Trade Commission U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC, Benjamin David Rashkovich, Portland, OR, John Philip Wiegand, Federal Trade Commission San Francisco Regional Office, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.
Alexis James Gilman, Pro Hac Vice, Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, DC, Altumash Mufti, Pro Hac Vice, Janae Nichelle Staicer, Pro Hac Vice, Jonathan B. Pitt, Beth A. Stewart, Pro Hac Vice, Carol J. Pruski, Pro Hac Vice, Heidi K. Hubbard, Pro Hac Vice, J. Liat Rome, Kaitlin J. Beach, Pro Hac Vice, Peter S. Jorgensen, Pro Hac Vice, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, Brian S. Cromwell, Caroline Bergen Barrineau, Sarah Fulton Hutchins, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Charlotte, NC, for Defendant Novant Health, Inc.
Adam Karl Doerr, Kevin Raymond Crandall, Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson, Charlotte, NC, Connie J. Lee, Pro Hac Vice, Joshua Lipton, Pro Hac Vice, Connor Leydecker, Pro Hac Vice, Jamie E. France, Pro Hac Vice, Logan Billman, Pro Hac Vice, Michael J. Perry, Pro Hac Vice, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC, Heidi K. Hubbard, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, Scott K. Hvidt, Pro Hac Vice, Gibson Dunn, Dallas, TX, Thomas Tyson, Pro Hac Vice, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant Community Health Systems, Inc.
Troy D. Shelton, Fox Rothschild LLP, Raleigh, NC, for Amicus Dale Folwell.
ORDER
KENNETH D. BELL, United States District Judge.
Antitrust law, specifically the Clayton Act, serves the important public interest of promoting fair and robust markets by prohibiting horizontal mergers that may substantially lessen competition. This case, however, raises an unusual question: How does that law...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
