SHIELDS OF STRENGTH, Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. Texas.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Signed May 31, 2024.
Signed May 31, 2024.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Ashu N. Balimba, Leonard Davis, Nan Lan, Carl Edward Bruce, Fish & Richardson P.C., Dallas, TX, Bernard Cryan, Pro Hac Vice, Oliver James Richards, Fish & Richardson PC, San Diego, CA, Danielle Runyan, David Jonathan Hacker, Erin Smith, Pro Hac Vice, Hiram Stanley Sasser, III, Jeffrey Carl Mateer, Michael Dan Berry, First Liberty Institute, Plano, TX, Kenneth Hoover, Austin, TX, Nicholas Wang, Fish & Richardson P.C., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff.
James C. Luh, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Lucy Grace D. Noyola, DOJ-Civ, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, Intellectual P, Washington, DC, Robert W. Meyer, Pro Hac Vice, DOJ-Civ, Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch, Washington, DC, David Lucian Pace, Intellectual Property Section, Washington, DC, for Defendants United States Department of Defense, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, Army Trademark Licensing Program Office, U.S. Marine Corps Trademark & Licensing Program Office, Navy Trademark Licensing Office, Air & Space Forces Intellectual Property Management Office.
Connor John Hackert, James C. Luh, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division-Torts Branch, Washington, DC, Lucy Grace D. Noyola, DOJ-Civ, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, Intellectual P, Washington, DC, Robert W. Meyer, Pro Hac Vice, DOJ-Civ, Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch, Washington, DC, David Lucian Pace, Intellectual Property Section, Washington D.C., DC, for Defendants Director Paul Jensen, Director Jessica O'Haver, Director Nadine Santiago, Director April Rowden.
Timothy S. Durst, Cason Garrett Cole, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Dallas, TX, Eugene Volokh, Ucla School of Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Amicus Protect The 1st.
OPINION AND ORDER
J. Campbell Barker, United States District Judge.
In this dispute over the military's trademarking of certain words and images, the court has already ruled on one motion to dismiss.1 Familiarity with that ruling is presumed here.
After that ruling, defendants filed a second motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.