1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 735 F.Supp.3d
  5. 735 F.Supp.3d 62 (2024)
 

DE JESÚS GÓMEZ v. MATOS RUIZ

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-01305-WGY, CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-01906-WGY.

735 F.Supp.3d 62 (2024)

Ricardo DE JESÚS GÓMEZ, Pedro Díaz Ortiz, and Carlos Méndez Busó, in Their Capacity as Shareholders of De Jesús & Matos Medical Imaging Professionals, P.S.C., Plaintiffs, v. Nelson Felipe MATOS RUIZ, in his Capacity as Shareholder of De Jesús & Matos Medical Imaging Professionals, P.S.C., Defendant. De Jesús & Matos Medical Imaging Professionals, P.S.C., Plaintiff, v. Nelson Felipe Matos Ruiz, Defendant, v. Ricardo De Jesús Gómez, his Spouse Olga Vanessa Ríos Robles, and the Conjugal Partnership Formed Between Them; Pedro Díaz Ortiz, his Spouse Liliana Zoe Miranda Broco, and the Conjugal Partnership Formed Between Them; Carlos Méndez Busó, his Spouse Yvette Marie Cruz Pagán and the Conjugal Partnership Formed Between Them; Demadi, PSC; Insurance Company XYZ; Company ABC; John & Jane Doe, Third Party Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.

Signed May 29, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry O. Freese-Souffront, McConnell Valdes, LLC, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs in No. 18-01305.

Juan R. Rivera-Font, Fortuno & Fortuno Fas, San Juan, PR, Melissa Dominguez-Rivera, Guaynabo, PR, for Defendant in Nos. 18-01305, 18-01906.

Moraima S. Rios-Robles, Arroyo & Rios Law Offices, P.S.C., Guaynabo, PR, for Plaintiff in No. 18-01906.

Henry O. Freese-Souffront, McConnell Valdes, LLC, San Juan, PR, for Third Party Defendants Ricardo De Jesus-Gomez, Olga Vanessa Rios Robles, Conjugal Partnership De Jesus-Rios, Pedro Diaz-Ortiz, Liliana Zoe Miranda Broco, Conjugal Partnership Diaz-Miranda, Carlos Mendez-Buso, Yvette Marie Cruz Pagan, Conjugal Partnership Mendez-Cruz in No. 18-01906.

Moraima S. Rios-Robles, Arroyo & Rios Law Offices, P.S.C., Guaynabo, PR, for Third Party Defendant DEMADI, PSC in No. 18-01906.

FINDINGS OF FACT, RULINGS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

Pursuant to Rule 39(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties withdrew their jury demand in this case, and consented to trial before the Court as factfinder. See Minute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases