1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 682 F.Supp.3d
  5. 682 F.Supp.3d 855 (2023)
 

MIKULSKY v. NOOM, INC.

Case No.: 3:23-cv-00285-H-MSB.

682 F.Supp.3d 855 (2023)

Erika MIKULSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NOOM, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

Signed July 17, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Pizzirusso , Pro Hac Vice, Hausfeld LLP, Washington, DC, Steven Nathan , Hausfeld LLP, New York, NY, Thomas M. Beh , Pro Hac Vice, Murray Law Firm, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff.

Aarti Reddy , Kyle Christopher Wong , Michael G. Rhodes , Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA, David Scott Louk , San Francisco, CA, Christina Jensen , Cooley LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

On May 8, 2023, Defendant Noom, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Erika Mikulsky's complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 12.) On June 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases