1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 730 F.Supp.3d
  5. 730 F.Supp.3d 81 (2024)
 

INMAR BRAND SOLUTIONS v. QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-994.

730 F.Supp.3d 81 (2024)

INMAR BRAND SOLUTIONS, INC. v. QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

Filed April 18, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Day, Andrew Colin Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE, Denise M. De Mory, Pro Hac Vice, Marc Belloli, Pro Hac Vice, Li Guo, Pro Hac Vice, for Inmar Brand Solutions, Inc.

Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE, Emily M. Whitcher, Pro Hac Vice, Katherine Q. Dominguez, Pro Hac Vice, Katherine M. Worden, Pro Hac Vice, Brian A. Rosenthal, Pro Hac Vice, for Quotient Technology Inc.

MEMORANDUM

At the outset of this case, Quotient Technology asks us to hold that patents exclusively licensed by Inmar Brand Solutions are ineligible for patent protection. We must decide whether the patent claims are directed to ineligible subject matter under the Supreme Court's two-step...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases