FORTINET, INC. v. FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 20-cv-03343-EMC.

730 F.Supp.3d 958 (2024)

FORTINET, INC., Plaintiff, v. FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Filed April 16, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Neukom, DeBevoise & Plimpton LLP, San Francisco, CA, Anthony P. Biondo, Pro Hac Vice, Douglas R. Nemec, Pro Hac Vice, Leslie Ann Demers, Pro Hac Vice, Rachel R. Blitzer, Pro Hac Vice, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, and Flom LLP, New York, NY, James Y. Pak, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff.

Allen S. Cross, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, Eimeric Reig-Plessis, Winston & Strawn, San Francisco, CA, James R. Batchelder, James Lawrence Davis, Jr., Shong Yin, Ropes and Gray, LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, Jolene L. Wang, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY, Kelly C. Hunsaker, Matthew R. McCullough, Winston & Strawn, Redwood City, CA, Saishruti Mutneja, Winston & Strawn LLP, Redwood City, CA, Kimball Richard Anderson, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, Matthew A. Hopkins, Pro Rae Vice, Winston and Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant.


ORDER ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Docket No. 208

I. INTRODUCTION

Forescout seeks partial judgment on the pleadings; it asserts that Fortinet's '662, '034, and '421 Patents are ineligible under 35 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases