1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 725 F.Supp.3d
  5. 725 F.Supp.3d 184 (2024)
 

PRINCETON EXCESS AND SURPLUS v. R.I. CRANSTON ENT.

C.A. No. 21-63-JJM-PAS.

725 F.Supp.3d 184 (2024)

The PRINCETON EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. R.I. CRANSTON ENTERTAINMENT INC.; Steven Medeiros; Abigail Ratchford; Alyssa Nobriga; Amanda Cerny; Arianny Lopez; Brenda Geiger; Brooke Johnson a/k/a Brooke Taylor; Denise Trlica a/k/a Denise Milani; Dessie Mitcheson; Devin Justine Takeguma; Emily Sears; Jaclyn Swedberg; Jaime Edmondson Longoria; Jessica Burciaga; Jessica Hinton a/k/a Jessa Hinton; Jessica Golden a/k/a Jesse Golden; Joanna Krupa; Keeley Hazell; Krystal Forscutt Hipwell; Lina Posada; Lucy Pinder; Mariana Davalos; Nikki Leigh; Paola Canas; Rhian Sugden; Shelby Chesnes; Tiffany Toth Gray; Tiffany Selby; and Ursula Mayes, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.

Signed March 26, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey Nosowitz, Pro Hac Vice, Christina S. Marshall, Anderson & Kreiger LLP, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff.

John V. Golaszewski, Casas Law Firm, P.C., New York, NY, Daniel Calabro Jr., Daniel Calabro Jr., Attorney at Law, Providence, RI, for Defendants R.I. Cranston Entertainment Inc., Steven Medeiros.

Daniel Calabro Jr., Daniel Calabro Jr., Attorney at Law, Providence, RI, Paul V. Sullivan, Sullivan Law Offices, PC, Providence, RI, John V. Golaszewski, Pro Hac Vice, Casas Law Firm, P.C., New York, NY, for Defendants Abigail Ratchford, Alyssa Nobriga, Amanda Cerny, Arianny Celeste Lopez, Brenda Gieger, Brooke Johnson, Denise Trlica, Dessie Mitcheson, Devin Justine Takeguma, Emily Sears, Jaclyn Swedberg, Jaime Edmonson Longoria, Jessica Burciaga, Jessica Hinton, Jessica Golden, Joanna Krupa, Keeley Hazell, `Crystal Forscutt Hipwell, Lina Posada, Lucy Pinder, Mariana Davalos, Nikki Leigh, Paola Canas, Rhian Sugden, Shelby Chesnes, Tiffany Toth Gray, Tiffany Selby, Ursula Mayes.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff The Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company's ("Princeton") Motion for Summary Judgment, and Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF Nos. 53, 58. For the reasons stated below, Princeton's Motion is DENIED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases