NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, National Consumer Law Center, and Alliance for Justice, for themselves and all others similarly situated,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Signed March 20, 2024.
Signed March 20, 2024.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jonathan E. Taylor, Pro Hac Vice, Deepak Gupta, Gupta Wessler PLLC, Washington, DC, Elizabeth S. Smith, Motley Rice, LLC, Washington, DC, Meghan S.B. Oliver, Pro Hac Vice, Motley Rice, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, SC, William H. Narwold, Pro Hac Vice, Hartford, CT, for National Veterans Legal Services Program, National Consumer Law Center, Alliance for Justice.
Brenda A. Gonzalez Horowitz, Jeremy S. Simon, Robert Aaron Caplen, DOJ-USAO, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Derek S. Hammond, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Washington, DC, for Defendant.
Bruce D. Brown, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Washington, DC, for Amici Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of Newspaper Editors, Associated Press Media Editors, Association of Alternative News Media, Center for Investigative Reporting, First Amendment Coalition, First Look Media Works, Inc., International Documentary Association, Investigative Reporting Workshop, Media Consortium, Mpa, National Press Photographers Association, Online News Association, Radio Television Digital News Association, Reporters Without Borders, Seattle Times Company, Society of Professional Journalists, Tully Center for Free Speech.
Sasha Samberg-Champion, Pro Hac Vice, Reiman Colfax PLLC, Washington, DC, for Amici American Association of Law Libraries, Deborah Beim, Thomas Bruce, Phillip Malone, Jonathan Zittrain.
Mark Bailen, Law Offices of Mark I. Bailen, Washington, DC, for Amici Joseph I. Lieberman, Darrell Issa.
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge.
For over fifteen years, PACER fees — the per-page fees that the federal judiciary charges the public for online access to court documents — have been a subject of controversy. As a result of the litigation in this case, the United States will return over $100 million...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
