1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 710 F.Supp.3d
  5. 710 F.Supp.3d 598 (2024)
 

MOTOBILT, INC. v. BYSTRONIC, INC.

No. 21 C 1996.

710 F.Supp.3d 598 (2024)

MOTOBILT, INC., Plaintiff, v. BYSTRONIC, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

Signed January 5, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Ekonen, Pro Hac Vice, W. Lee Gresham, III, Pro Hac Vice, Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Birmingham, AL, Mark Richard Miller, Wallace Miller, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Edmund James Siegert, Tara Cristin O'Mahoney, Cremer, Spina Shaughnessy Jansen & Siegert LLC, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Plaintiff Motobilt is a manufacturer of custom automotive parts. It filed this breach of warranty action to recover losses it claims to have sustained when equipment it purchased from defendant Bystronic failed to function as warranted.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases