1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 681 F.Supp.3d
  5. 681 F.Supp.3d 490 (2023)
 

DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. v. VIDAL

1:21-cv-899 (LMB/JFA).

681 F.Supp.3d 490 (2023)

DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Katherine K. VIDAL, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

Signed July 11, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Igor Victor Timofeyev , Pro Hac Vice, Jeffrey Arthur Pade , Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Edward John Bennett , Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, Joshua David Tully , United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP.

Hugham Chan , Rebecca S. Levenson , United States Attorney's Office, Alexandria, VA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this civil action, plaintiffs Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. ("Daiichi Sankyo") and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP ("AstraZeneca") (collectively, "plaintiffs") challenge the Fintiv instructions, a set of non-exclusive factors adopted by the United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases