1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 657 F.Supp.3d
  5. 657 F.Supp.3d 591 (2023)
 

XMTT, INC. v. INTEL CORP.

Case No. 18-cv-1810-MFK.

657 F.Supp.3d 591 (2023)

XMTT, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

Signed February 22, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE, Anthony Rowles, Pro Hac Vice, Benjamin W. Hattenbach, Pro Hac Vice, Conor Tucker, Pro Hac Vice, Jordan Nafekh, Pro Hac Vice, Los Angeles, CA, Michael H. Strub, Pro Hac Vice, Costa Mesa, CA, Philip Warrick, Pro Hac Vice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Brian D. Matty, Pro Hac Vice, Jamie L. Kringstein, Pro Hac Vice, Jeffrey S. Seddon, II, Pro Hac Vice, Michael Wueste, Pro Hac Vice, Paul A. Bondor, Pro Hac Vice, Raymond N. Habbaz, Pro Hac Vice, New York, NY, Lindsey E. Miller, Pro Hac Vice, Baltimore, MD, Jack B. Blumenfeld, Jeremy A. Tigan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE, Ryan G. Thorne, Pro Hac Vice, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

XMTT has sued Intel for infringement of two patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,707,388 (the '388 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 8,145,879 (the '879 patent). The patents are directed to a "computer memory architecture for hybrid serial and parallel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases